The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Then you have people, and there aren't that many, but a handful of people who are like, "Well, it is possible that this Lyme could behave something like herpes simplex," where it's like a recurring infection essentially and maybe it takes root in the nervous system somehow and only comes back out in times of stress. There are people, credible doctors who have been like, "It's not completely beyond the realm of possibility that is has some recurring nature."
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.