We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
um it's puzzling to me why it's so it's got such traction this idea that there are these Universal um Expressions that we can use to read each other you know um it's it's just not true I mean the science just it's so overwhelmingly I feel like you know scientists I don't like to use the t word you know the fword fact you know it's a scary word t word truth but I think in this case I feel like I can I can really at least with a little te I can I can use it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.