The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
at that time it was interesting so insurance and the payers you have medicare government medicaid and then you have the the commercial payers at that time it was still investigational so medicare our government did not reimburse for transplants it was regarded as experimental for about eight years and they did a very smart thing they designated certain centers to figure it out
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.