The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if this breaks and the blood supply is disrupted and that's not corrected quickly then the bone in that area no longer has Supply it will die and can't support the cartilage anymore the cartilage will collapse and you get a AVN of the head and that is a hip replacement which is obviously difficult for anybody but for someone who's in their 20s 30s 40s it's so the treatment for this when you make the diagnosis is rest is rest typically
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.