The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the pathophysiology seems to be twofold one is that if you have no immunity to the virus it can go multiple places it won't stay in your body long term like hiv but it can go multiple places that's one mechanism and the second is that your innate immune response if you have no immunity to the virus can lead to inflammation that lingers
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.