We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
what you're seeing is these industrial strength big guns like pax levitt and so tear map are being used in very low risk people sometimes people with wealth and power and access that tend to get and that's where we need to say hey wait a minute we have all these tools in the toolbox let's use them selectively and wisely based on somebody's individual risk
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.