The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
as it's interesting if you look at like the bowhead whale or the naked mole-rat or some really long-lived mammalian species they actually display pretty high natural co2 tolerance so it may also be a little bit of a longevity play to to teach yourself how to maintain oxygen and carbon dioxide at high level simultaneously
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.