The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what we know in human biochemistry is that much like a rodent if we over consume a thining without balancing it with glycine we may be setting ourselves up for biochemical stress biochemical disaster
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's a whole series of experiments that were done in the 1950s and 1960s on rats that everyone cites saying excess methionine is bad for you and really when they did the follow up experiments what they found was that it was the absence of glycine or the imbalance of glycine that was the really detrimental thing and when they added glycine back to those rodent experiments they saw a prolongation of life and longevity