The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
he talks about the mechanism of action for glyphosate interrupting the Shikha main pathway which is also problematic for the microbiome and they the justification that glyphosate is safe is that hey this shaker made the shaky mcpadden some humans well it's present in bacteria so you know putting in a pesticide into your gut that could disrupt the microbiome in a big way potentially be pretty problematic not a good thing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
here's the paper talking about glyphosate suppression of cytochrome p450 enzymes and amino acid biosynthesis by the gut microbiome