The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's this other experiment right where Einstein basically comes to the conclusion that one of two things has to be true either particles are moving faster than the speed of light or they are containing within them deciding information neither could be true he sets out to prove it and the only way he can prove it is to violate something withheld in quantum theory itself and I believe it was through the photoelectric effect
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.