The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i think that one of the reasons the different blood types evolved was infectious agents so let's put foods aside bacteria viruses use these glycoproteins on the surface of our cells to attach and there are certain blood types which are more susceptible or less susceptible to certain infections so i think that it's more likely that blood types evolved in response to infections
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.