The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Since dr frond's study has come out there have been several investigations in chinese populations and indian populations in caucasian populations replicating dr funds results a 75 to 79 response rate in regrowth metrics that range from 18 to 21
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
since dr frond's study has come out there have been several investigations in chinese populations and indian populations in caucasian populations replicating dr funds results a 75 to 79 percent response rate and regrowth metrics that range from eighteen to twenty one percent