Peter Attia· MD
and um and we also have a very predictable pathogenesis where we must go from a poop we must go from an adenoma to a carcinoma yes and we can detect the presence of the adenoma because it is outside the body effectively
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and um and we also have a very predictable pathogenesis where we must go from a poop we must go from an adenoma to a carcinoma yes and we can detect the presence of the adenoma because it is outside the body effectively
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
again colon cancer is a very specific cancer in that it progresses in what we call a hean fashion that means it has a progress from normal to not normal but non-cancer to cancer and it has to go through that progression remember this is not necessarily the case of all cancers at least in a way that we can observe them