The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it may be that there was enough at-risk populations that it's very hard to cherry-pick individuals when there's so many people who absolutely need it that that it just becomes easier to vaccinate the whole population rather than say okay well you're in a specific at-risk ethnic group or you're in a specific at-risk occupational hazard
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.