The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I used to have a lot of experience with apheresis when I was back in the lab and this was super complicated I mean at the time we were identifying we were trying to extrapolate her rather identify lymphocytes so you would put a huge 14 gauge needle in one arm draw a bunch of blood out run through the apheresis machine and basically return everything except the lymphocyte that's serious business like you've got to know exactly what you're doing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.