The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And definitely, there's been so many studies now with mask-wearing too, right? I mean, you know, it doesn't have to be an N95 mask, I mean, even, you know, someone wearing a cloth mask, it can both protect you from infecting others, and also can actually filter out some to some degree, some particles that are, you know, you won't be exposed to as many viral particles as if there were no mask, even if it's not a super high-quality N95 mask, you know, filtering out particles.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.