The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
It turns out natural killer cells don't like that very much. This is very primordial branch of the immune system that we think about innate immunity, adaptive immunity as being primordial versus more modern, quote unquote, higher organisms having them. Any case, these natural killer cells, which are part of the more primordial immune surveillance machinery, if they see a cell not showing MHC complexes, That targets that cell for destruction.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so basically if a cell if a cancer cell were trying to hide itself if you will by not expressing um these receptors to present antigens then there's actually a branch of the immune system that's basically you know natural killer cells as they're called they're very primordial immune cells are supposed to just you know swoop in and and kill those cells and and we have evidence that that does occur
natural killer cells as they're called they're very primordial immune cells they're supposed to just you know swoop in and and kill those cells and we have evidence that that does occur