The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the RQ or the respiratory quotient is the ratio of co2 produced or vco2 divided by the amount of oxygen consumed or the vo2 and and that'll vary sort of between you know typically about 0.7 and one right correct you can see it outside of those ranges the lower it is the more they're partitioning and drawing from fat the higher it is the more they're drawing from glycogen correct
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.