Rhonda Patrick· PhD
it's not as simple as more ace 2 receptor bad less ace 2 receptor good and in fact it seems to be quite the opposite in terms of this SARS Cove one virus at least
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's not as simple as more ace 2 receptor bad less ace 2 receptor good and in fact it seems to be quite the opposite in terms of this SARS Cove one virus at least
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when it's binding to the ACE to your receptor it's decreasing the ACE 2 receptor it's also decreasing these two levels and that is causing worse injury in the lungs because it's dis regulating the Rena and angiotensin system