The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's also worth mentioning at least with the parabiosis experiments the the parabiosis experiment itself shortens lifespan in rodents and so the parab just the the fact that you're surgically connecting these animals together so it may be that the benefit from parabiosis true parabiosis in that context is somehow related to the shortening of lifespan due to the procedure
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but there may be something about the procedure itself that is increases muscle repair and improves cardiac function it just seems to me that's you know I agree I'm just saying that may be an alternative explanation for something that's limiting in those Mouse experiments