The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I will say my own arc of my career and as I've gotten as I've sort of diluted the medical piece with other ways of thinking um I'm not so quick to shut that down. Um there may be something either vital happening for that person in the bed to express whatever's in there. Um it may be something that's helpful for the person to hear.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.