Paul Saladino· MD
so it is false for anyone to say that we are descended from herbivores we're descended from omnivores
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so it is false for anyone to say that we are descended from herbivores we're descended from omnivores
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
as we evolved from chimpanzees and bonobos we went from being an omnivorous an omnivorous species specialized at the plant trophic level to an omnivorous species that strongly appears to be specialized at the animal food trophic level