The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it is therefore my belief that the more we can do to screen for cancer and catch it earlier the better we will be but we do pay a price for that we pay a financial price for that in other words it costs money to screen early and we pay potentially an emotional price from that because as we'll get to and you alluded to we have to now get into false positives and false negatives
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you catch a breast cancer or a colon cancer when there are tens of millions or hundreds of millions of cancer cells your odds of treating that successfully are better than if you catch the same cancer years later when there are billions of cells