The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the study shows that this particular test is looking at certain fragments or rnase of the virus this fragment of the virus can stay in your system for awhile but those are dead viruses and you're not going to be able to be passing on the infection to other people
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
An overly sensitive RT-PCR test might be detecting non-infective RNA fragments rather than infectious viral particles.