The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
as you know neither group appears to be stricken by the the type of chronic disease we see in the West right but but there either I got that comparison I think it's always interesting that if we look at the hunter-gatherer groups who are eating more meat there are some studies sort of anthropological Oracle studies that suggest that the guys who are getting more animal foods are doing a little better right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.