The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they actually decide the footwear they have a clothing store because nobody pays for anything it's all common money and at a clothing store he ordered minimal shoes so 80 percent of their community now are in minimal shoes and he showed a graph of the number of referrals to podiatrists went down as his prescription of minimal footwear went up
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.