The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's a very large collection of individually rare inborn errors of mitochondrial metabolism these are typically single gene disorders they can be due to recessive mutations in the nuclear genome or they can be due to mutations in the mitochondrial genome but at the end of the day there's a component of the mitochondrion that's defective at birth
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
they tend to follow a bimodal distribution the recessive mutations in the nuclear genome they tend to present early in infancy within the first few weeks or months of life the mutations in the mitochondrial genome those tend to present a little bit later