The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
correlates the divorce rate in maine with the per capita consumption of margarine and we will see we will see that they are highly correlated more than 99 correlated okay okay does that mean that as the divorce rate in maine declines margarine or as margarine declines the divorce rate in maine declines does that mean that margarine was causing divorce in maine right this is the absurdity
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.