The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they even used to use radium internal internal nasal applications in the 19 I guess 1920s to 1940s essentially a rad a radiation equivalent of a tonslectomy or adoidctomy and it was done in something like a half million to two million children in the US and even in the armed forces it was done routinely back then and there's been very few adverse squella that were reported
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
even they even used to use radium internal internal nasal applications in the 19 I guess 1920s to 1940s essentially a rad a radiation equivalent of a tonslectomy adoidctomy and it was done in something like a half million to 2 million children in the US and even in the armed forces it was done routinely back then and there's been very few adverse squella that were reported