The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what I mean by tearing the labrum is you separate the labrum the inner Arc from its hard bony cartilaginous uh perfectly fused attachment very strong it takes a massive Force to to dislocate the shoulder it actually does or perfect mechanics
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and what I mean by tearing the laum is you separate the laam the inner Arc from its hard bony cartilagenous perfectly fused attachment very strong it takes a massive Force to to dislocate the shoulder it actually does or perfect mechanics and so if you if you have the classic um you're reaching up to get a a rebound and someone grabs your arm um and jerks it backwards that's a leverage an unnatural leverage that the makes the head tend to go out this direction anteriorly inferiorly like this