The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
with the modern treatment now with first first of all not using cobalt using linear accelerators the energy of the photons is higher which means the skin dose is slightly lower so you're getting maybe 100% on the skin rather than 150% like you once did so we don't see anywhere near the skin reaction that we used to
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
with the modern treatment now with first first of all not using cobalt using linear accelerators the energy of the photons is higher which means the skin dose is slightly lower so you're getting maybe 100% on the skin rather than 150% like you once did so we don't see anywhere near the skin reaction that we used to it's more of a you know maybe a grade one or a grade two ariththemma a mild redness or maybe sometimes a little bit of you know like it's a sunburn but nothing as severe as we used to