The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the goal with medicine 3.0 and prevention is still to put that off as far as possible but that doesn't mean you're going to put it off until you're 120 years old the goal is to really live as robustly as possible and avoid those as long as you can but still kind of more in the traditional lifespan opposed to the 150y old lifespan
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the second pillar of Medicine 3.0 is that Health span is to be given at least as much effort and attention as lifespan this is again another enormous difference between medicine 2.0 and Medicine 3.0 medicine 2.0 does not Place emphasis on health span its emphasis on health span is anywhere from zero to very small most of the healthcare dollars are spent on addressing uh and trying to elongate lifespan um and I would argue that we need to be you know putting just as much effort into Health span