The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you look at sort of the contagiousness index and the um and the efficacy of the vaccine there's a formula for this you would figure you that you probably would need at least 80 percent of the population to be immune either from natural infection or immunization to slow the the spread of this virus
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I do think we can get control of this virus if we can get at least 80 percent of the population