We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
but what was really interesting was within something like two to three days of being back on earth the twin that was in space had a complete reversion to what his brother was when he was back on earth and maybe I'm just skeptical but that made me a little less interested in telomeres is a particularly relevant metric of the age of an individual
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
my feelings on this matt i'm in the camp that thinks measuring telomere length is not helpful at all for aging and i think there's plenty of data to suggest that while telomere length is a very important marker of cellular division it really speaks very little about the orgas the organism's state of aging