Paul Saladino· MD
they might have uranium and not tell you about it like san pellegrino or gerald steiner
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they might have uranium and not tell you about it like san pellegrino or gerald steiner
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
for instance gerald steiner here was 50 of the uranium intake in this german study
some of these german ones like gerald steiner have a uranium concentration of 1.9 micrograms per liter not insignificant
So, for instance, Gerolsteiner here was 50% of the uranium intake in this German study.
And then some of these German ones like Gerolsteiner have a uranium concentration of 1.9 micrograms per liter, not insignificant.
Uh contribution of uranium in mineral water to the daily uranium intake. So, for instance, Gerolsteiner here was 50% of the uranium intake in this German study. That's significant. If you just stop drinking Gerolsteiner, you'd have half 50% less uranium, which is a radioactive element. I would do that. Uh look, 84% from Saskia, Liesinger, Font Ronda.