The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
even shortly after um World War II we actually had artif artificial neural networks the the perceptron which was modeled roughly speaking on the ideas of a neuron that could take inputs from the uh environment and then have certain expectations and if you updated the neuron as to what was going on it would update the weights going into that artificial neuron
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.