The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but this one where it subluxes out the front those are also a problem you can see that they they there's nothing there's no way it's going to fall back into place there so either they stay out they stabilize and people just don't do that much to irritate them or they have to be reconstructed and I've had to go in and reconstruct these where I take a a tendon from the form and make a figure of eight across the front and basically rebuild those ligaments to hold it back
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.