The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the reason the lateral was historically Associated and called tennis elbow is because of one-handed backhands it's a much less mechanically sound and it's we have less strength with our external rotators than we have with our pectoralis and our subscapularis for forehand shots so it's under more stress
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the reason the lateral was historically Associated and called tennis elbow is because of one-handed backhands it's a much less mechanically sound and it's we have less strength with our external rotators than we have with our pectoralis and our subscapularis for forehand shots so it's under more stress
the reason the lateral was historically Associated and called tennis elbow is because of one-handed backhand it's a much less mechanically sound and it's we have less strength with our external rotators than we have with our pectoralis and our subscapularis for forehand shots so it's under more stress