We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
one other point on that Paul that I think is a real mistake that the Press has made and frankly I think that the vaccine companies have made is they have not communicated clearly the difference between relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
one other point on that paul that i think is a real mistake that the press has made and frankly i think that the vaccine companies have made is they have not communicated clearly the difference between relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction