The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
observations are as we age these nad levels decline... if you biopsy muscle from individuals of varying ages you'll see a gradual decline in the nad content if you quantify the amount of mitochondria using any of the different metrics you'll see a decline if you look at things like vo2 max and skeletal muscle as a function of age you'll see a gradual decline
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.