The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so so these cast proteins work with the crisper RNA and crisal RNA refers to these repeats which are encoded in DNA but they are made by bacteria into RNA and those RNA are called crisper RNA and they don't incode protein and they simply are a short guide sequence that directs the the cast protein to find the target virus sequence
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so so cast protein crisper RNA they together form a complex that go and provide a defense function for the bacteria
this is why the system is so powerful because it's able to you know very quickly in a parallel of fashion find the match and then inactivate the virus within minute within minutes
the bacteria in the crisper repeat area has a signature of this virus so the repeat area will get turned on and it will start to make crisper RNA that carry a 30 base paralon or 20 based parong guide that's able to recognize um the in the incoming virus so the cast protein will bind to these Crystal RNA they will go and try to search along all the DNA sequences in the bacteria when it finds a match in the virus's DNA it will activate the nucleuses and will cut the DNA