The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's just not let's say you're not 100 immune but the structure of sars co2 is very similar to other coronaviruses and there is certainly cross sensitivity and on some of the previous controversial thoughts videos i'd done i'd shown some papers in flu vaccinations suggesting that those with metabolic dysfunction were less likely to form a long-term memory response with the crosstalk between the cda t cells and the rest of the immune system
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.