The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
this makes me think of Coke's appendicitis hey this is more complicated and two I don't think there'll ever be a substitute for the Nuance of the exam and this the history both the history of the injury and the history of what causes pain
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so it's interesting to think that in Orthopedics it might be one of those Specialties where this judgment of the exam is still really really relevant
this makes me think of cop's appendicitis a this is more complicated and two I don't think there'll ever be a substitute for the Nuance of the exam and the the history both the history of the injury and the history of what causes pain