Peter Attia· MD
if you're doing 10 things, you don't have any idea what's working and what's not working and whether things might be impairing each other. And I really think that's a scary path to go down.
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
if you're doing 10 things, you don't have any idea what's working and what's not working and whether things might be impairing each other. And I really think that's a scary path to go down.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you're doing 10 things, you don't have any idea what's working and what's not working and whether things might be impairing each other.
The thing they're more likely to cancel each other out than to have additive effects. And so if you're mixing 20 colors of or taking 20 pills, it's like mixing 20 colors of paint together. You're going to get some ugly gray outcome or at best you're going to get an unknown outcome that we can't predict.