Paul Saladino· MD
a white oak which took their farm from 0.5 percent carbon to 5 carbon in 5 in 22 years they can now have a 5 inch rain event and not lose the soil not lose the topsoil because it won't run off
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
a white oak which took their farm from 0.5 percent carbon to 5 carbon in 5 in 22 years they can now have a 5 inch rain event and not lose the soil not lose the topsoil because it won't run off
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
at white oak which took their farm from point five percent carbon to five percent carbon in five in 22 years they can now have a five inch rain event and not lose the soil not lose the topsoil because it won't run off when we were at the bison harvest at rome ranch taylor had this little awesome diorama set up where he had these multiple sections of soil set up with different amounts of carbon he'd actually transplanted them from different parts of the farm i believe and he watered all of them equally and you could absolutely see that the soil that was more degraded from the more degraded parts of the farm versus the soil from the parts of the farm that had been more uh highly rehabilitated which is what they're doing at rome ranch the more highly rehabilitated soil with more carbon sequestered more water it just stayed in there it didn't run off and you could see it in the bottom there was a runoff space and you could see this this low carbon monocrop degraded soil