Rhonda Patrick· PhD
This study showed no cross-immunity but another study showed there was.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
This study showed no cross-immunity but another study showed there was.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
This study also provided some preliminary evidence that antibodies made in response to other coronaviruses may provide some cross immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Although another study found that this was not the case, but we will come back to that later.