The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
many people get trots in their arms so for a variety of vaccines this vaccine often causes lymph node enlargement under your arm so-called ipsilateral lymphadenopathy that's not common um you see it with a smallpox vaccine um which is another powerful ammunition and you see it with this vaccine
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it is it those those antigen presenting cells travel to the local lymph node and then stimulate that response there to the extent that your lymph node actually enlarges it is a powerful image