The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's a break and an accelerator in every car you don't just get in your car and smash the brake and go anywhere nor would we as humans and as we see if we don't have enough of the accelerator we will be very short we will have sleep problems like Laurent doors there are benefits to that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's like the buzzword right on Netaji and I like that in the book you you note that we need to have some of both there's a break and an accelerator in every car you don't just get in your car and smash the brake and go anywhere nor would we as humans and as we see if we don't have enough of the accelerator we will be very short we will have sleep problems like Laurent doors there are benefits to that but I think we can what we're trying to do here is really be precise and nuanced and just like we were considering with the indigenous people take the best from both worlds right understand how to do both in the best way that we can