Peter Attia· MD
So I think you just stop the clock in terms of that evolution when you come along and either a patient and their bodies tell them that they have a tumor or it's only found or whatever the diagnostic trick is.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So I think you just stop the clock in terms of that evolution when you come along and either a patient and their bodies tell them that they have a tumor or it's only found or whatever the diagnostic trick is.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
More evolution was going to be needed in the primary tumor to be able to launch now micrometastases that had all the skills to be able to both set up shop in the first place, live in a dormant state for not just months, but years and even decades in some cases, and then make their way out again.