We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
and secondly because we can't logistically follow those people for the next 50 years which is what would be necessary to understand its true magnitude of gero protection we would need really good biomarkers of aging of which i will pause it and you may disagree we have somewhere between zero and epsilon of those i mean we don't have diddly squat in the way of meaningful biomarkers of aging
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I personally don't think we have very many at all